Skip to content
Cover Wales
Back to The NationThe Nation · Water policy

Water report calls for income-linked bills and a Welsh citizens’ assembly

Foundational Economy Research says ownership and regulation changes need wider reform. Its analysis separates accounting finance expenses from cash payments.

Christine Jones ·

Archive photograph of Llandegfedd Reservoir, 29 December 2024. Photo: Horep, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; cropped.

Archive: Llandegfedd Reservoir, December 2024. Water-infrastructure context, not a photograph of a current incident. Horep / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0.

Original photographCC BY-SA 4.0

Water charges linked more closely to household income and a Welsh citizens’ assembly on investment priorities are among the proposals in a new report on the water industry’s finances. Foundational Economy Research, an action-research group, argues that changes to ownership or regulation need to be combined with charging reform and greater public involvement. Its October briefing examines Welsh Water and Thames Water using historical company accounts. These are the authors’ recommendations, not an announced change to customers’ tariffs.

Accounting costs are not the same as cash paid

For Dŵr Cymru, the researchers calculate cumulative finance expenses of £4.7 billion over 2001–25, against £3.4 billion in cash financing payments. The expenses measure includes both cash and non-cash interest, including inflation-linked components. That distinction matters: an expense recorded in the accounts is not necessarily a cash payment made at the same time. The totals are the research group’s calculations across the period, rather than a breakdown of a household’s current bill. They should not be added together.

Foundational Economy Research calculates £4.7 billion in cash and non-cash finance expenses and £3.4 billion in cash financing payments for Dŵr Cymru over 2001–25. These are different measures, not amounts to add together.

Authors’ calculations from historical Dŵr Cymru regulated accounts, as presented on page 14 of the October 2026 report. Original chart: Cover Wales.

Chart: Cover WalesSource dataCC BY 4.0

What the authors want to change

The report acknowledges that Dŵr Cymru has no shareholders and pays no shareholder dividends. It argues that bond funding alone does not remove the problem of financing infrastructure renewal and services. The authors propose income-linked charging as a longer-term objective, alongside more generous support for low-income households. They also argue that public ownership or tighter regulation, on their own, would leave wider questions about revenue, investment and priorities unresolved.

A costed choice for citizens

For Wales, the group calls for a costed “bill of works” showing different investment options, their likely outcomes and the trade-offs involved. It proposes a citizens’ assembly, advised by experts, to discuss those choices. Other suggestions include a water observatory involving civil society and independent expertise, and a standing Senedd committee with resources to examine financial and environmental performance. The report does not set a new bill for an individual household or announce that these bodies will be established. Its evidence is an analysis of past accounts and a case for reform, rather than a new regulatory finding or independent audit.

Background and supporting figures

Where this sits

2 checked facts

  1. How does it compare?

    • Finance expenses exceed cashpayments in theauthors’ aggregate; difference cannot be labelledcashpaid,profit,ornewdebtwithoutfurtherreconciliation.

      foundationaleconomyresearch.com

    • No shareholders and zero shareholderdividends do not imply zero financingcosts; report distinguishes ownership from funding needs.

      foundationaleconomyresearch.com

Every line above was checked against the source named beside it before this piece was published.

ShareWhatsAppX